Rachel Carson increased awareness about environmental
issues that were typically glanced over. Environmental science was primarily
concerned with conservation, but did not take on the challenges of chemical
regulation as a form of responsible control and preservation. She expounded upon
the etymology of man-made chemicals and the never ending cycle of chemical
warfare between man and the environment. At the rate in which new chemicals
continue to be introduced in society, there is no way man can possibly develop
a biologic response quick enough to combat the challenges chemicals pose to our
health and the environment at large. I don’t believe she was completely against the
use of pesticides, but rather suggesting further insight into the issue of
chemical contamination and it’s long term effects with regards to sustainability as well as
responsible control. Our unquenchable thirst to establish an abundance of a
certain thing begets the opportunity of a natural imbalance, which will all too
often have negative consequences. This coincides with the noted “Ecology of Invasions”, mentioned to
illustrate the opportunistic nature of foreign plant and insect species that
thrive in our environment without any natural check and balance that is usually
accustomed to their native land, thus spurring destructive human responses to
control them with the use of dangerous chemicals. Rachel Carson’s portrayal of
DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichlorethane) in the environment affected changes in
laws about our air, land and water. Silent Spring not only expounded upon
chemical exposures, but also touches on many environmental issues such as
bioaccumulation, noise pollution and sustainability. I believe the overall message
was to raise consciousness specifically about DDT and the detrimental effects
our actions (primarily brought on by the industrial age) have on all organisms
in the present day and the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment